From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5 Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:14:11 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3E15B803.8080507@hekimian.com> <5xptrcjv3l.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xadifkudi.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xn0mb42ta.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042155237 5509 80.91.224.249 (9 Jan 2003 23:33:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18WmBQ-0001Qb-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:33:56 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18WmHA-0007ug-00 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:39:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Wm7f-0004vp-01 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Wm6v-0004j5-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:29:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Wm0h-0003R8-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18WlsJ-0001Hi-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:14:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18WlsJ-0000Wl-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:14:11 -0500 Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-reply-to: <5xn0mb42ta.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10612 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10612 Defining P_ in config.h (via configure) is of course possible, but even if we change everything (except the Glibc originated files) to use P_, we still will have the __P definition in config.h Why would we still have the __P definition in config.h? Is there some reason we could not delete it, once it was not used?