From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:13:06 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18VaoE-0002KQ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021225080757.7483D-100000@is>
	<3E15B803.8080507@hekimian.com> <E18Ufmh-0003nF-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<5xptrcjv3l.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk><5xadifkudi.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041989855 14420 80.91.224.249 (8 Jan 2003 01:37:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 01:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18W59y-0003kR-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 02:37:34 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18W5En-00065Z-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 02:42:33 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18Vxxt-0003LR-09
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2003 12:56:37 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18Vaon-0008SQ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:13:41 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18Vaod-0008Ct-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:13:32 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18VaoF-0007jq-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:13:07 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18VaoE-0002KQ-00; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:13:06 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk
In-reply-to: <5xadifkudi.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10547
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10547

    2) a wider, non-localized change (_P and __P => P_)

Now that I understand the situation, I think that is best.
It is still a fairly localized change, localized to pop.c.

Would you like to do it?