From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower? Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:30:47 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87adpxob2n.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <87bs5r1cyp.fsf@gnu.org> <87hecud8ef.fsf@alice.dynodns.net><87u1gqpyss.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041625918 31340 80.91.224.249 (3 Jan 2003 20:31:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 20:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18UYU1-00089M-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:31:57 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18UYWn-0004Rr-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 21:34:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UYUc-0008Bc-0B for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UYUJ-00086z-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UYUG-00082U-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:32:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18UYSw-0007gP-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:30:50 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18UYSt-0004wY-00; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:30:47 -0500 Original-To: johnw@gnu.org In-reply-to: <87u1gqpyss.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> (message from John Wiegley on Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:50:11 -0700) Original-cc: p.lord@russet.org.uk X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10442 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10442 >> This issue is now closed. I discovered that the implementation of >> "wide-column.el" was the culprit. It was abusing the >> post-command-hook in a way that worked in 21.2, but not in 21.3. >> I have referred the problem to the author. > Can you tell me what the problem is? Maybe I should fix what > broke. I did not take the time to track it down, nor can I just yet. I would recommend talking with the author, We are having a misunderstanding. I am not talking about changing wide-column.el. You say that wide-column.el is doing something with post-command-hook that worked in 21.2 but not in 21.3. Can you show me what it is doing? Maybe I should change 21.3 so that that usage works once more. I assume that in order to form an opinion of that usage you must first have seen what the usage consists of. So I figure you can tell me this quickly. Is that not so?