From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:32:27 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18UIZP-0006CS-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1030102075335.669B-100000@is>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041564840 12290 80.91.224.249 (3 Jan 2003 03:34:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 03:34:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18UIas-0003C6-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 04:33:58 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18UIdJ-0003KX-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 04:36:29 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18UIb9-0002sD-0B
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:34:15 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18UIaq-0002mt-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:33:56 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18UIao-0002kH-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:33:55 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18UIZP-00025S-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:32:27 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18UIZP-0006CS-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:32:27 -0500
Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1030102075335.669B-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:56:15 +0200 (IST))
Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10427
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10427

    Any line in an @example that is longer than about 61 characters will 
    trigger overfull hbox in TeX.  Any line in @smallexample that is longer 
    than 64 characters will do the same.

The font used in @smallexample is considerably smaller than the one
for @example--I am sure the difference in capacity is more than just 3
characters.