From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: iso-8859-1 and non-latin-1 chars
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:42:14 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18NyJq-0003h4-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <rzq65uhy6ew.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
	<E18Isn0-0007Zb-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<rzqhedrp0f5.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk><rzqlm2rfdx0.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1040057843 10054 80.91.224.249 (16 Dec 2002 16:57:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: handa@m17n.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18NyYO-0002bV-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:57:16 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18Nylx-0004CJ-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:11:17 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18NyQz-0001zT-00
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:49:37 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18NyOG-0000Y0-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:46:48 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18NyNi-0000JB-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:46:15 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18NyJq-0007Zn-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:42:14 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18NyJq-0003h4-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:42:14 -0500
Original-To: d.love@dl.ac.uk
In-reply-to: <rzqlm2rfdx0.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (message from Dave Love on 15
	Dec 2002 16:24:43 +0000)
Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10168
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10168

    Sure, but the cases I'm particularly thinking of are actually
    programs, not interactive use.  I think it's better to get escape
    codes, which can be reconstructed, than to get `?', which can't.

Please describe one of these cases *precisely*, so we can see if we
agree with you.