From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: TODO additions
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:10:03 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18CBKN-0005Io-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <rzqiszzc41k.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> <E185wzJ-0000zO-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <rzq8z0hyvcn.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> <E186wTn-00030R-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <rzqpttq1nfk.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> <E187p1K-0004Wa-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <rzqpttbdfrf.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> <20021112131828.GA2331@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037248194 29823 80.91.224.249 (14 Nov 2002 04:29:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 04:29:54 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18CBdZ-0007ks-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:29:53 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18CBpm-000162-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:42:30 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18CBcV-0001CW-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:28:47 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 18CBKR-0001cJ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:10:07 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 18CBKO-0001by-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:10:06 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18CBKO-0001bm-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:10:04 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18CBKN-0005Io-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:10:03 -0500
Original-To: miles@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <20021112131828.GA2331@gnu.org> (message from Miles Bader on Tue,
	12 Nov 2002 08:18:28 -0500)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9405
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9405

    What I wonder is if xemacs actually supports it _correctly_, or whether they
    just use a sort of `mostly works' heuristic like I mentioned before.

If something that "mostly works" is good enough when used in XEmacs,
maybe it is worth doing.