From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 07:06:49 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18A7uT-0007ic-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021106082925.960E-100000@is> <5xbs52oor1.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200211070808.RAA09270@etlken.m17n.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036758338 3451 80.91.224.249 (8 Nov 2002 12:25:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:25:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: storm@cua.dk, eliz@is.elta.co.il,
	monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18A8Ce-0000tV-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:25:36 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18A8M7-0005d7-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:35:23 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A8AX-0006YD-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 07:23:25 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A7uY-0003JJ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 07:06:54 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A7uU-0003HP-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 07:06:52 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A7uU-0003HJ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 07:06:50 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18A7uT-0007ic-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 07:06:49 -0500
Original-To: handa@m17n.org
In-reply-to: <200211070808.RAA09270@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi
	Handa on Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:08:04 +0900 (JST))
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9258
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9258

    (2) I've just installed an automatic character composition
    mechanism in emacs-unicode branch.  It works like font-lock.
    I think it is worth back-porting to HEAD

Why bother?  We could just wait till we adopt the Unicode changes
and we will get to the same place.