From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: info invisible changes
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:08:40 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E189oGu-0007su-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <buoy98dhg1n.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <200211011623.gA1GNAL03601@rum.cs.yale.edu> <buowunsirq5.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <5xznsnvabl.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>  <buo1y5zc9gs.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <200211061511.gA6FBfL02691@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036682807 27883 80.91.224.249 (7 Nov 2002 15:26:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:26:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, storm@cua.dk,
	monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 189oWR-00073A-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:24:43 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 189ofU-0002wK-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:34:04 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 189oUd-0005ZB-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:22:51 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 189oH3-0001R1-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:08:49 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 189oGx-0001P9-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:08:47 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 189oGw-0001P3-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:08:42 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 189oGu-0007su-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:08:40 -0500
Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs/pretest@rum.cs.yale.edu
In-reply-to: <200211061511.gA6FBfL02691@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs/pretest@rum.cs.yale.edu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9222
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9222

    > I agree with Stefan that the text should be refilled in the top-level
    > dir node -- it's special because it contains much more hidden text than
    > a normal node, and looks especially bad without refilling, and also it's
    > not connected with a file (it's generated), so it's safe to modify.

There is no reason to hesitate about refilling the dir node.  It is
constructed inside Emacs anyway.