From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Hiding  *Note:: "tags" in info files
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:27:21 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E187J6H-00040l-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20021029120319.95A4F7C012@mail.filanet.dk>
	<E186wSv-0002t4-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <5xvg3jo57z.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036085876 6805 80.91.224.249 (31 Oct 2002 17:37:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:37:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 187JGV-0001lc-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:37:55 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 187JMB-0007BF-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:43:47 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 187JDB-0006PI-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:34:29 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 187J6N-0002Ea-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:27:27 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 187J6I-0002At-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:27:25 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 187J6I-0002AB-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:27:22 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 187J6H-00040l-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:27:21 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk
In-reply-to: <5xvg3jo57z.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9008
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9008

    The following improved patch does that for *Note but not for *note.

    BTW, should it handle *note Item: Section. differently from *note Item:: 
    (e.g. by hiding the Section part)?

    In any case, there are many incorrect uses of *Note: in the info files,
    so you will still see a some "see See ..." occurrences.

How about checking for the presence of "see" in the buffer,
and putting in "See" only if there is no "see"?