From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: suggested new command `picture-mouse-set-point'
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:02:02 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E186Mdm-0007Ca-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E184rFF-0007Cn-00@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> <E185XK0-0002F3-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <20021028162541.9CE4.LEKTU@terra.es>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035860574 29045 80.91.224.249 (29 Oct 2002 03:02:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 03:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jpw@shootybangbang.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 186MeX-0007Xp-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 04:02:49 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 186Mix-0008He-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 04:07:23 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 186MfE-0006fV-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:03:32 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 186Mdq-0006EG-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:02:06 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 186Mdn-0006Cx-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:02:04 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 186Mdm-0006Cd-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:02:02 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 186Mdm-0007Ca-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:02:02 -0500
Original-To: lektu@terra.es
In-reply-to: <20021028162541.9CE4.LEKTU@terra.es> (message from Juanma
	Barranquero on Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:31:33 +0100)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8867
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8867

    > * If you do an insert-file and that file is currently modified in
    >   another buffer but not written yet, print a warning.

    Which other insert-file-like functions should be affected? I assume it's
    only interactive commands, and not `insert-file-contents' nor
    `inset-file-contents-literally', but what with `insert-file-literally',
    and the gazillion `find-file*' functions?

The find-file functions will simply use that buffer, so this issue
does not apply to them.  It does apply to insert-file-literally.