From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: while-no-input
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:15:36 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E185XLM-0002RO-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200210012119.g91LJW922045@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<E17wp6i-0002XX-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200210022143.g92LhXQ28321@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<E17x61m-0004mr-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200210031553.g93FrwH31218@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<E17xUfD-00049i-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200210041559.g94Fx9006880@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<5xr8egzom4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<200210240720.g9O7KxV11421@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<5xelagp218.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <E184x8I-0003pt-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <5xznt2yiy3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035664038 13601 80.91.224.249 (26 Oct 2002 20:27:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:27:18 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185XWe-0003XF-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:27:16 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 185XZy-0002CN-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:30:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XQW-0008ID-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:20:56 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XO3-000767-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:18:23 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XNp-0006ub-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:18:21 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XLT-0005iB-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:15:43 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XLM-0002RO-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:15:36 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk
In-reply-to: <5xznt2yiy3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8821
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8821

    True, but as I read Stefan's comments, removing the ugliness at the
    Lisp level comes at the expense of increased ugliness and decreased
    functional correctness at the C level.

I don't think so.