From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: suggested new command `picture-mouse-set-point'
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:13:36 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E185XJQ-0002Ay-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E184Ps1-0006W3-00@bundalo.shootybangbang.com>
	<5xn0p4znhw.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<E184e8L-0006rr-00@bundalo.shootybangbang.com> <5xr8ef4ipi.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035663255 12051 80.91.224.249 (26 Oct 2002 20:14:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:14:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jpw@shootybangbang.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185XK1-00038D-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:14:13 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 185XNJ-0001sn-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:17:38 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XKF-00057Y-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:14:27 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XJa-0003uc-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:13:46 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XJR-0003W7-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:13:44 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XJR-0003VZ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:13:37 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 185XJQ-0002Ay-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:13:36 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk
In-reply-to: <5xr8ef4ipi.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8805
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8805

    > Maybe there could be a `mouse-set-point-function' variable that would
    > be funcalled where `mouse-set-point' is presently called directly, or
    > `mouse-set-point' could call `mouse-set-point-rigidly' iff
    > `mouse-set-point-rigidly' variable was non-nil, or something like
    > that?

This is gratuitous complexity on a point that is not terribly important.
The added feature in picture.el that JPW already wrote is worth adding,
but I don't want to go any further.