From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:56:19 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E182let-00078Y-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <rzqu1jseva6.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
	<E180a3D-0002Cs-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <rzqptubeh2w.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> <E181fx7-000067-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <200210161221.g9GCLYIv023011@copa.pajato.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035003726 7783 80.91.224.249 (19 Oct 2002 05:02:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 05:02:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 182lkT-00021P-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:02:05 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 182mdD-0001iO-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:58:39 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 182lka-0003vH-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:02:12 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 182ljx-0003hg-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:01:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 182lju-0003h4-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:01:32 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 182let-0002KY-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:56:19 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 182let-00078Y-00; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:56:19 -0400
Original-To: pmr@pajato.com
In-reply-to: <200210161221.g9GCLYIv023011@copa.pajato.com> (message from Paul
	Michael Reilly on Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:21:34 -0400)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8576
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8576

    I'm inclined to decode each message when displaying it.

That is not as simple as it sounds.  When exactly would Rmail decode
a message, and when would it reencode a message?  Would the current
message always be in decoded form and the others in encoded form?