From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: while-no-input
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:33:23 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17xrrn-0002Zu-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200210012119.g91LJW922045@rum.cs.yale.edu> <E17wp6i-0002XX-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <200210022143.g92LhXQ28321@rum.cs.yale.edu> <E17x61m-0004mr-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <200210031553.g93FrwH31218@rum.cs.yale.edu>  <E17xUfD-00049i-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <200210041559.g94Fx9006880@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033836013 11773 127.0.0.1 (5 Oct 2002 16:40:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 16:40:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17xryM-00033Z-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 18:40:10 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17xskY-0007s4-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 19:29:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17xrx3-0007aK-00; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:38:49 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17xrvB-0002Us-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:36:53 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17xrur-0001l1-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:36:34 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17xrrn-0001Gz-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:33:23 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17xrrn-0002Zu-00; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:33:23 -0400
Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
In-reply-to: <200210041559.g94Fx9006880@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8407
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8407

    The reason I didn't do that is that it didn't seem necessary
    and that I didn't want the QUIT macro to grow, but I could introduce
    a new function `quit' that the QUIT macro could call and which would
    either call `Fsignal (Qquit, Qnil)' ot `Fthrow (...)'.

That would be ok.