From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of utf-8.el, etc [Re: Several serious problems] Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:03:09 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200208190748.QAA14278@etlken.m17n.org> <200208291325.WAA03596@etlken.m17n.org> <200208291732.g7THWRU11411@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200209250701.QAA10989@etlken.m17n.org> <200209300909.SAA05081@etlken.m17n.org> <200209301329.g8UDT8d13183@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200210010737.QAA06919@etlken.m17n.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033502730 27853 127.0.0.1 (1 Oct 2002 20:05:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, d.love@dl.ac.uk, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17wTGq-0007F0-00 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 22:05:28 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17wU1A-0000zN-00 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 22:53:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17wTH6-0002ZM-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wTEd-0002Nz-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wTEc-0002Nb-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17wTEc-0002NV-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17wTEb-0000eO-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:03:09 -0400 Original-To: handa@m17n.org In-reply-to: <200210010737.QAA06919@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:37:36 +0900 (JST)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8304 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8304 I don't have a strong opinion on whether we should provide these two customizable variables or not: unify-8859-on-encoding-mode utf-translate-cjk Are these decisions users will really want to change?