From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of utf-8.el, etc [Re: Several serious problems] Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:08 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200208190748.QAA14278@etlken.m17n.org> <200208291325.WAA03596@etlken.m17n.org> <200208291732.g7THWRU11411@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200209250701.QAA10989@etlken.m17n.org> <200209251435.g8PEZKh10820@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200209252347.IAA12034@etlken.m17n.org> <200209261356.g8QDuTO15360@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200209271524.g8RFOpd23131@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033183996 13511 127.0.0.1 (28 Sep 2002 03:33:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 03:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, handa@m17n.org, keichwa@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17v8Lz-0003Vg-00 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 05:33:15 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17v94V-0007d7-00 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 06:19:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17v8MA-0004iw-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17v89Q-0003HQ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17v89J-0003Ef-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17v89I-0003EP-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17v89I-00034B-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:20:08 -0400 Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu In-reply-to: <200209271524.g8RFOpd23131@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8213 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8213 >From my point of view, all the effort put into 21.3 is effort not put into 21.4. Since 21.4 fixes most/all of those problems already, I think all this work done on 21.3 is wasted. 21.4 is likely to be many months away.