From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound.. Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:47 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208271621.g7RGLNm30516@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xhehfe3aj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5x4rdfdzu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208281413.g7SEDkT03872@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xvg5thgw8.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208291724.g7THOJZ11366@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xd6roult6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031615360 13020 127.0.0.1 (9 Sep 2002 23:49:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, miles@gnu.org, deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17oYHP-0003Nm-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:49:19 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17oYrY-0000sQ-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:26:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17oYHT-0006eW-00; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17oY3T-0003gm-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17oY3R-0003ga-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17oY3R-0003gU-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17oY3L-00066J-00; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:47 -0400 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 09 Sep 2002 15:14:59 -0400) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7786 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7786 The question would be very annoying. I think it should terminate and define the macro. If the user wants to ignore that definition, he can. If the user wants to add to it, he can do that too. Someone suggested that the erring command should be omitted from the macro. I agree, that is definitely desirable.