From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC and select-safe-coding-system Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:07 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1031486626.430.24.camel@eagle> <200209091408.g89E85p18357@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031615173 12689 127.0.0.1 (9 Sep 2002 23:46:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: spiegel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17oYEN-0003IW-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:46:11 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17oYoX-0000l2-00 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 02:23:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17oYER-00061c-00; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17oY2l-0003Tq-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17oY2i-0003R4-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17oY2i-0003Qp-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17oY2h-00061J-00; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:34:07 -0400 Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu In-reply-to: <200209091408.g89E85p18357@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7783 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7783 Maybe this bug was "fixed" since my original report by renaming the backup file back to its non-backup name in case of an abort by the user. I had forgotten making that change. That might indeed have fixed it. But I think the problem of having a "temporarily missing file" should be fixed as well (there will always be such a time-window anyway, but we should make it shorter by making sure we don't prompt the user during this time). That may require substantial rearrangement. Anyone want to see how much?