From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bugs caused by recent use of define-derived-mode Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:16:53 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200209020237.VAA26080@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200209021629.g82GTY707192@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200209022302.SAA26633@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200209031506.g83F6Yh12528@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200209031536.KAA27166@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200209032123.QAA28184@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200209040001.TAA28292@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200209060211.VAA03128@eel.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031368722 27857 127.0.0.1 (7 Sep 2002 03:18:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 03:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, miles@gnu.org, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17nW7N-0007FB-00 for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 05:18:41 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17nWg8-0003J3-00 for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 05:54:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17nW7L-0000xS-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17nW5g-0000eM-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17nW5e-0000do-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17nW5e-0000di-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17nW5d-00082o-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 23:16:53 -0400 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7663 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7663 > I also have a hard time seeing why the most local abbrev table would > be such an obvious default for C-x a (i) l. I think that's the current behavior, isn't it? There is no "current behavior" for this question. The question never arises at present. There is only one local abbrev table for a major mode, and C-x a l uses that one.