From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please consider emacs-unicode for pervasive changes Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:01:46 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <E17nAJW-0003ku-00@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020905164418.18455A-100000@is> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031285291 14008 127.0.0.1 (6 Sep 2002 04:08:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 04:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@etl.go.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org> Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17nAPi-0003do-00 for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 06:08:10 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17nAzi-00042b-00 for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 06:45:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17nARM-0002SO-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17nAJZ-0001Y9-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17nAJX-0001Xj-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17nAJX-0001Xb-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17nAJW-0003ku-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 00:01:46 -0400 Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020905164418.18455A-100000@is> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:48:28 +0200 (IST)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7605 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7605 In other words, running `diff' on the original and the edited files will not show any changes in those line you didn't modify. However, unification means that `diff' _will_ sometimes show differences in unedited portions of the file, because C2 was recoded into a different codepoint. Given that we are using unicode and unification, isn't this inevitable?