From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.xemacs.design,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: INFO on add-ons
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 14:02:37 -0400
Sender: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org
Message-ID: <E17n0xh-0000aZ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <3D728E82.8000808@cox.net> <87ptvxxkoj.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <buok7m5jhpm.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <87fzwtxad9.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <3D73F6D1.7010002@cox.net> <874rd7wuos.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <3D74D797.7000707@cox.net> <m17mGSM-000IeBC@localhost> <buo8z2imu1o.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>  <87bs7etocv.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <200209041549.g84FnQp19483@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031248889 9615 127.0.0.1 (5 Sep 2002 18:01:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:01:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, miles@gnu.org, bob@rattlesnake.com,
        emacs-devel@gnu.org, xemacs-design@xemacs.org
Return-path: <xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org>
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org ([207.96.1.200])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17n0wX-0002UM-00
	for <xemacs-design@gmane.org>; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 20:01:25 +0200
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA09349;
	Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:03:02 -0400
Original-Received: (from turnbull@localhost)
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA09316
	for xemacs-design-mailman@xemacs.org; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:02:41 -0400
Original-Received: (from mail@localhost)
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA09312
	for turnbull@tux.org; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:02:41 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA09304;
	Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:02:38 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17n0xh-0000aZ-00; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 14:02:37 -0400
Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
In-Reply-To: <200209041549.g84FnQp19483@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
X-XEmacs-List: design
Errors-To: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org
X-BeenThere: xemacs-design@xemacs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:xemacs-design-request@xemacs.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:xemacs-design@xemacs.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xemacs.org/lists/listinfo/xemacs-design>,
	<mailto:xemacs-design-request@xemacs.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of design and features for XEmacs. <xemacs-design.xemacs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xemacs.org/lists/listinfo/xemacs-design>,
	<mailto:xemacs-design-request@xemacs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.xemacs.design:1419 gmane.emacs.devel:7572
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7572

We're not going to replace Texinfo with a different format,
so please don't spend a lot of time arguing about the question.

However, GNU packages are welcome to use any other format you like
which can be converted automatically into a good Texinfo file.  So
there's no need to argue about that either.