From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: patch to emacsbug.el proposed..
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:26:02 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17mDgw-0002Ey-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87hehaol77.fsf@computer.localdomain>
	<E17lefA-0003I7-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wuq5uu33.fsf@computer.localdomain>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031059589 7743 127.0.0.1 (3 Sep 2002 13:26:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17mDhK-00020m-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 15:26:26 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17mEG3-0007Cd-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:02:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mDiq-0004Co-00; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:28:00 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mDgz-0003eG-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:26:05 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mDgw-0003dh-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:26:04 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mDgw-0003db-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:26:02 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17mDgw-0002Ey-00; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:26:02 -0400
Original-To: deego@glue.umd.edu
In-Reply-To: <87wuq5uu33.fsf@computer.localdomain> (message from D. Goel on 01
	Sep 2002 20:13:36 -0400)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7373
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7373

    > Isn't that method easier than remembering another command to do the
    > job?

    the user can still always follow the older method :).  This will just
    provide an additional way.

The question is whether it is worth even the added complexity.
I think not, not for just interactive use.