From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: INFO on add-ons Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:53:43 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3D728E82.8000808@cox.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030978453 29374 127.0.0.1 (2 Sep 2002 14:54:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 14:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17lsai-0007df-00 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 16:54:12 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17lt8y-0000bN-00 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 17:29:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17lscD-0008UT-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17lsaI-00089W-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17lsaG-00089J-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:53:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17lsaF-00089D-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17lsaF-0007iz-00; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:53:43 -0400 Original-to: superbiskit@cox.net In-Reply-To: <3D728E82.8000808@cox.net> (superbiskit@cox.net) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7330 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7330 Would nearly everyone agree that folks who provide/maintain packages or FSF Emacs Please don't call our program "FSF Emacs". That term was coined by XEmacs developers and it is subtly a put-down. I don't think all Emacs packages need their own manuals. Only some of them need manuals.