From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:01:10 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17leeU-0003D9-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
 <200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu> <5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
 <200208271621.g7RGLNm30516@rum.cs.yale.edu>
 <buolm6r6b25.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <5xhehfe3aj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
 <buowuqbl5wv.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
 <buoofbnl586.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
 <874rdfaytt.fsf@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> <E17kCJF-0000yw-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <vaflm6q6mq6.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
 <E17keyZ-0008A7-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <m2r8geqole.fsf@primate.xs4all.nl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030924908 5000 127.0.0.1 (2 Sep 2002 00:01:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:01:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17lef4-0001IS-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 02:01:46 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17lfD2-00050U-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 02:36:52 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17legX-0001ul-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:03:17 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17leeW-0001ll-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:01:12 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17leeU-0001lT-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:01:11 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17leeU-0001lL-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:01:10 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17leeU-0003D9-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:01:10 -0400
Original-To: huug.at.gmane@xs4all.nl
In-Reply-To: <m2r8geqole.fsf@primate.xs4all.nl> (message from huug on Sun, 01
	Sep 2002 07:13:33 +0200)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7290
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7290

    > Do people think we should remove the F2 bindings?  We could provide
    > commands on F2 and F3 that resemble simple text editors.

There seems to be disagreement about whether there is any uniformity
among widely used text editors in their use of F2 and F3.  If there
is no uniformity, it is not clear what convention we could usefully
follow in Emacs.