From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:17:56 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17krHI-0004dC-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<200208271621.g7RGLNm30516@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<buolm6r6b25.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<5xhehfe3aj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<buowuqbl5wv.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<E17kCIx-0000wF-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<buon0r6o48v.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<E17kez2-0008EJ-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <buo1y8g6f33.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030735368 23300 127.0.0.1 (30 Aug 2002 19:22:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 19:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: storm@cua.dk, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu,
	deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17krLz-00063h-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:22:47 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17krst-0005GA-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 21:56:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17krNO-0004X7-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:24:14 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17krHL-0003xR-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:17:59 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17krHJ-0003xF-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:17:58 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17krHJ-0003xA-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:17:57 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17krHI-0004dC-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:17:56 -0400
Original-To: miles@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <buo1y8g6f33.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on 30 Aug 2002 15:22:24 +0900)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7176
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7176

    Hmm, what I was thinking was that it would end the macro definition, and
    immediately execute the macro.  I'm not sure that there's much
    advantage to having it just end the macro,

Simplicity is the advantage.

But what actually has been implemented?  Does C-x e just close the macro
definition, or does it execute the macro again?