From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [CVS] f7, f8 bound..
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:10:16 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E17kez2-0008EJ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87lm6xiruh.fsf@computer.localdomain> <5xu1liwmu6.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<200208261526.g7QFQX624783@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<5xu1lgu1e4.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<200208271621.g7RGLNm30516@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<buolm6r6b25.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<5xhehfe3aj.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<buowuqbl5wv.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<E17kCIx-0000wF-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <buon0r6o48v.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030688547 3179 127.0.0.1 (30 Aug 2002 06:22:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 06:22:27 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: storm@cua.dk, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu,
	deego@glue.umd.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17kfAm-0000p0-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:22:24 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17kfhQ-0003iP-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:56:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kfCC-0005Rq-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:23:52 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kezC-000241-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:10:26 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kez3-00023O-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:10:25 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kez3-00023J-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:10:17 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17kez2-0008EJ-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 02:10:16 -0400
Original-To: miles@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <buon0r6o48v.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on 29 Aug 2002 10:14:40 +0900)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7149
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7149

    I also think that `C-x )' is still a useful command; sometimes I want to
    just end the current macro definition with, without executing it (e.g.,
    when I'm defining the macro in a different buffer on some fake data).

I think there is a misunderstanding here.  Isn't that exactly
what C-x e will now do if you are defining a macro?