From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: I was asked something in a *compilation* window Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:24:28 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87sn3hvchm.fsf@jidanni.org> <3D135B1B.2080600@ihs.com> <874rftmvle.fsf@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> <3D189163.4000907@ihs.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025130459 4569 127.0.0.1 (26 Jun 2002 22:27:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 22:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLGE-0001Ba-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:27:38 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLIY-0004rQ-00 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:30:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLGR-0003du-00; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:27:51 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17NLDA-0003K7-00; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:24:28 -0400 Original-To: kevinr@ihs.com In-Reply-To: <3D189163.4000907@ihs.com> (message from Kevin Rodgers on Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:50:59 -0600) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5223 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5223 What effect does sending an eof have on compilers such as Make? Does it cause them to terminate if they ask a question? I thought that there was some way to send input to the process. If not, we could easily add a command to send input. One other idea is that M-x compile should operate on top of comint. That is a natural idea, and people thought of it before; ISTR there was some drawback to it, but I don't recall what it was. Does anyone know?