From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Gildea <gildea@stop.mail-abuse.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:26:21 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E171AQI-0004W9-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <rms@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019845636 5840 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2002 18:27:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:27:16 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 171ARA-0001W5-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:27:16 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 171ATv-0007fq-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:30:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 171AR9-0004c1-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:27:15 -0400
Original-Received: from sj1-3-5-7.securesites.net ([192.220.127.8])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 171AQI-0004W9-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:26:22 -0400
Original-Received: (qmail 53199 invoked by uid 25345); 26 Apr 2002 18:26:21 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (HELO sgildea.best.vwh.net) ([192.220.99.1]) (envelope-sender <gildea@stop.mail-abuse.org>)
          by 192.220.99.1 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; 26 Apr 2002 18:26:21 -0000
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> 
   of "Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:38:37 MDT." <200204261738.g3QHcbl05147@aztec.santafe.edu> 
X-Mailer: mh-e 6.0; nmh 1.0.4; Emacs 20.4
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3319
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3319

>   A threshold may be the wrong way to decide, but it could be that a
>   mixture CRLFs with some extra CRs should be accepted as DOS-style.

More generally, we could have a mapping of sets of line-endings
observed to what eol encoding to use.  I would then enter in
this table (("\r\n" "\r\r\n") . 'dos).