From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@fencepost.gnu.org>
Cc: walters@verbum.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: config.in
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 05:22:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16xle4-0002k4-00@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <buo662qamzo.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles Bader on 17 Apr 2002 14:54:35 +0900)
> From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
> Date: 17 Apr 2002 14:54:35 +0900
>
> > > Note that even if these generated files are included, they may _still_
> > > need the auto* programs, because CVS makes no attempt to preserve
> > > timestamps, and the Makefile will attempt to regenerate the files
> > > anyway (though the checked-out contents are actually `up to date').
> >
> > This can be handled with a simple call to `touch', if it turns out to
> > be a real problem.
>
> That is an annoying and error-prone method of dealing with the problem
> (and yes, it's a problem, that's why this issue keeps coming up); more
> often than not, by the time you realize something's amiss, it's too
> late, and CVS has screwed up the file by inserting conflict markers.
>
> Morever, such a solution is _certainly_ not something that you'd
> recommend to clueless users; it's easier to tell them to install
> autoconf!
You misunderstood me--or rather, I didn't explain well enough what I
meant. I didn't mean to suggest a manual `touch'. The idea was to
put something into the configury which will do that automatically,
assuming we can detect time stamp mismatches that are produced by CVS.
> However, if we remove configure from CVS, then we should be consistent
> and remove the other autoconf generated files too, since they don't
> require any additional tools.
Yes, I agree that we should be consistent here.
> > As another data point, the GDB development keeps all regenerated
> > files in the CVS, including configure and even the Info files.
>
> That is their decision (though I wouldn't be surprised if exactly this
> same flame war pops up periodically on their mailing lists).
FWIW, I'm reading their lists for the last couple of years, and I
don't remember any complaints.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-17 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-16 18:24 config.in Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-16 18:45 ` config.in Miles Bader
2002-04-16 19:40 ` config.in Colin Walters
2002-04-16 21:00 ` config.in Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-16 21:21 ` config.in Alfred M. Szmidt
2002-04-17 4:44 ` config.in Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-17 4:59 ` config.in Colin Walters
2002-04-17 5:08 ` config.in Miles Bader
2002-04-17 9:29 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-17 0:00 ` config.in Karl Eichwalder
2002-04-17 5:13 ` config.in Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-17 9:24 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-17 1:08 ` config.in Miles Bader
2002-04-17 5:33 ` config.in Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-17 5:54 ` config.in Miles Bader
2002-04-17 9:22 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2002-04-17 9:28 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-17 12:09 ` config.in Miles Bader
2002-04-18 18:45 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-19 10:08 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-19 12:19 ` config.in Kim F. Storm
2002-04-19 11:42 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-19 13:02 ` config.in Kim F. Storm
2002-04-20 17:26 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-21 15:58 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-22 7:47 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-22 9:18 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-23 0:24 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-23 9:54 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-24 17:55 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-24 18:27 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-26 3:17 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-26 14:32 ` config.in Andreas Schwab
2002-04-26 14:05 ` config.in Kim F. Storm
2002-04-27 22:41 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-17 12:30 ` config.in Pavel Janík
2002-04-17 14:43 ` config.in Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-17 19:34 ` config.in Pavel Janík
2002-04-18 18:45 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-17 16:05 ` config.in Richard Stallman
2002-04-17 17:13 ` config.in Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-17 17:40 ` config.in Colin Walters
2002-04-17 19:30 ` config.in Pavel Janík
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E16xle4-0002k4-00@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=eliz@fencepost.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=walters@verbum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).