From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Buffer listing in multiple frames/ttys Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:33:03 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133374421 14958 80.91.229.2 (30 Nov 2005 18:13:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 19:13:34 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhW1O-0004wM-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:45:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhW1N-0001dV-GK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:45:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EhUtP-000664-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:33:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EhUtM-00064t-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:33:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhUtM-00064j-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:33:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [141.146.126.228] (helo=agminet01.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EhUtL-00083p-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:33:12 -0500 Original-Received: from rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.49]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id jAUGmTF2001645; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:48:29 -0600 Original-Received: from rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id jAUGX3gd002495; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:33:04 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap (dradams-lap.us.oracle.com [130.35.177.126]) by rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with SMTP id jAUGX3cO002490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:33:03 -0700 Original-To: =?utf-8?Q?Lorentey_K=C3=A1roly?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46821 Archived-At: > C-x C-b from various buffers > Perhaps there is a bug in the buffer list for each frame - or > perhaps the doc (Info) is not clear? When I do (frame-parameter > (selected-frame) 'buffer-list) in the different frames, each is a > list of multiple buffers (in spite of pop-up-frames forcing one > buffer per frame), and they are in different orders. =20 I think I have found the problem. When you use C-x 4 C-f, the new buffer gets displayed by `pop-to-buffer', and that function records the newly created buffer in the buffer list of the existing frame as well as the new frame. This is clearly not right. =20 I removed the duplicate call to record_buffer in CVS. Thanks.