unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: should search ring contain duplicates?
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:46:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICKEBDDGAA.drew.adams@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1FfQ24-0002cT-K7@fencepost.gnu.org>

    	See the thread at
    	http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-09/msg00038.html
    
        Thx. The only argument I see in that thread for ever 
        allowing duplicates is the point RMS raised about a
        command history.
    
    Could you show me what I said, back then, about a command history?  I
    don't remember it, and it is not easy for me to look through a thread.

Clicking the link shows this:

 There was one question left, if removing duplicates from history
 should be turned on by default. 
 IMHO duplicates should be removed from history by default, most users
 are more interested in the unique data present in history. If an exact
 sequence of events is desired M-x list-command-history can do that.

 [I reformated the last message from Stephan in that thread  to make it
 clear who said what]:

 Dan> How about the default? Should this be turned on by default? 
 Juri>     It seems reasonable to turn it on by default.

 RMS> Absolutely not!  It would be a great surprise, and it would mean
 RMS> you could not look around at your error messages without changing
 RMS> other buffers on the screen.

 Stephan> Huh?  I don't understand why removing duplicates from the history
 Stephan> would ever have any such effect.
 Stephan> Could you explain what use case you're thinking of ?

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-14 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-14 23:29 should search ring contain duplicates? Richard Stallman
2006-05-14 23:46 ` Drew Adams [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-03  0:54 Drew Adams
2006-05-03  7:27 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2006-05-03  8:26   ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-03 12:48     ` Juri Linkov
2006-05-03 13:53       ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-04 10:12         ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-04 10:29           ` David Kastrup
2006-05-04 12:00             ` Stefan Monnier
2006-05-04 12:19             ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-04 12:25               ` David Kastrup
2006-05-05 22:14               ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-05 23:55                 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-06  8:00                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-06 23:36                     ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-07 20:41                       ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-04 16:05             ` Stuart D. Herring
2006-05-04 16:23               ` David Kastrup
2006-05-04 16:36                 ` Stuart D. Herring
2006-05-04 21:55               ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-09 20:47       ` Juri Linkov
2006-05-10  9:34         ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-10 22:55           ` Juri Linkov
2006-05-11 10:08             ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-14 23:29             ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-15  9:54               ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-16  4:29                 ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-16 11:07                   ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-03 14:18   ` Stefan Monnier
2006-05-03 14:25     ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-03 14:40     ` Drew Adams
2006-05-03 15:54       ` Drew Adams
2006-05-03 20:27         ` Juri Linkov
2006-05-03 23:08           ` Drew Adams
2006-05-04 14:17         ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-04 15:07           ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-04 22:44             ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-05 19:05             ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-05 19:14               ` Drew Adams
2006-05-05 19:25                 ` David Kastrup
2006-05-05 20:09                   ` Drew Adams
2006-05-06 14:25                   ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-05 23:22                 ` Juri Linkov
2006-05-05 23:32                   ` Kim F. Storm
2006-05-06  2:05                   ` Drew Adams
2006-05-03 14:43     ` Dan Nicolaescu
2006-05-04 19:41     ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-03 20:42   ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-03 22:41     ` Dan Nicolaescu
2006-05-04 19:41       ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICKEBDDGAA.drew.adams@oracle.com \
    --to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).