From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: RE: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:42:49 -0700 Message-ID: References: <38309.128.165.123.18.1189462300.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189471594 17917 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2007 00:46:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:46:34 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 11 10:46:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IV0Ov-0003HK-Rc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:43:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IUsuY-0007C3-S2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:43:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IUsuV-0007Bk-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IUsuS-0007BM-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IUsuS-0007BJ-J0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUsuS-0004t4-9U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUsu4-0000T2-R0 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:42:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUsuO-0004sB-DF for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUsuO-0004rn-2R for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id l8ANh9E2019109 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:43:09 -0500 Original-Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id l8A63IJs026655 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:43:09 -0600 Original-Received: from dhcp-4op11-4op12-west-130-35-178-203.us.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3200656831189467769; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:42:49 -0700 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <38309.128.165.123.18.1189462300.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78531 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:19836 Archived-At: > I'm not sure if you're saying it should try reading because of the Emacs > 20 bug you're about to describe, or because you don't know (having written > this before my reply to your previous mail) that printing now raises an > error if the read would fail. The latter. But the fix I made to the Lisp has nothing to do with Emacs 20 per se. Without your C change, it's also needed for Emacs 22. If your C change ensures that everything written is readable, then reading is not needed in Lisp, of course. I wasn't clear on your C change, and I thought you had just forgotten the read that was there before (for Emacs 22). Sorry about that. > So there are two [Emacs 20] bugs...but I don't see the relevance to > savehist, especially since the signaling print on which I made it rely > will never exist in Emacs 20. The Emacs 20 bug only served to help me test. Otherwise, it's irrelevant here.