From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: [drew.adams@oracle.com: mouse-2 on menu item yanks into current buffer] Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:21:19 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141669209 4516 80.91.229.6 (6 Mar 2006 18:20:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 18:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 06 19:20:02 2006 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FGKJO-0000r2-00 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:20:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGKJX-0006pB-7d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:20:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGJwC-0003ek-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FGJw7-0003dT-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGJw7-0003d7-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [141.146.126.228] (helo=agminet01.oracle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1FGIVO-0008RK-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.49]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k26GLi0V027151 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:21:44 -0600 Original-Received: from rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k26GLiDR015354 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:21:44 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap (dhcp-amer-whq-csvpn-gw3-141-144-80-51.vpn.oracle.com [141.144.80.51]) by rgmsgw300.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with SMTP id k26GLhL3015343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:21:43 -0700 Original-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-Spam-Report: 5.0 points; * 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 50 to 56% * [score: 0.5021] * 5.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net * [Blocked - see ] Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51276 Archived-At: > This does not happen on GNU/Linux, so I think it is a > Windows-only bug. Or it is because Drew continues to use an 8 months old build. I don't claim that the bug has been fixed, but who knows? Who knows, indeed? How to find out? In this case, trying the reproduce-bug recipe should take less than 2 seconds for someone on Windows - certainly less time than to send an email saying "who knows?". > In GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > of 2005-06-26 on NONIQPC Come on, Drew. It's time to upgrade before you report more bugs! I think you'll find that the great majority of bugs I've reported had not already been fixed. But I recognize that it is a nuisance to track down a bug report for something that is already fixed. I don't use an old binary on purpose, just to frustrate you and hassle with more bugs myself. If someone points me to a more recent Windows binary that is vanilla Emacs (and that I can get to by http), I'll grab it and use it in a heartbeat. This is the most recent binary I have found. How about a release ;-)? If you like, I can stop reporting bugs until I have a release to report on. Or I can report what I happen to see now, and you can ignore the reports until you get a confirming report from a more recent build.