From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 64e25cd: More robust NS hex colour string parsing Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:40:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200608120746.30163.87810@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200608120747.80E8E20A2E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83r1uk429y.fsf@gnu.org> <3C92A091-F389-4179-B2F0-B3AA5ABD6CCE@acm.org> <87a718w0wt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="47171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 13 12:41:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jk3bi-000CC5-Jc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:41:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48022 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk3bh-0000Mc-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk3an-0007wr-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:40:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1443c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.43]:59254 helo=mail264c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jk3al-00077q-Qk; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:40:53 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1592044847; bh=THH5HLtJSikOyJ+tSgYJ5cQaoUf1tI3DDBf46vmbcTw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=fD10GvFoLMRIAeYL3UASmG1b2/r+Nlb7jE8rkgvmo4ZyvqqUOjc65ycCuenZGzI/X yzJaqoMobou2EjL52qBW8X0uUrLko9QHqAzBXcGZF4fjbo0vI7nqxF3y5DVAP2k+h+ YpJCVKGXD2n4q1BRQscTaazcITZsW29adzfuSW6I= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c188-150-171-71.bredband.comhem.se [188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail264c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 05DAejM1032232; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:40:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87a718w0wt.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F1D.5EE4ACB8.0006, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=PPNxBsiC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=nIji5eky4BrDQD_8p-UA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.14.43; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail264c50.megamailservers.eu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/13 06:40:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252156 Archived-At: 12 juni 2020 kl. 21.15 skrev Pip Cet : > Only quite recently; the X version was changed to use the standard > scaling convention Thanks for the perspective, and for driving through the reform at the = time. The suggested patch obviously builds on top of your work. I got fed up with silently getting nonsense from mistakes like #12345 -- = lax error checking is just unhelpful. There are probably a lot more duplication and inconsistencies between = the backends, which is to be expected in a system that evolved during a = long period of time.