From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: CEDET merge question
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:46:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DDCB7204-3CE3-4A04-8623-9AB963A0C29D@raeburn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1MkJoS-0006X7-W2@fencepost.gnu.org>
On Sep 6, 2009, at 11:37, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I ask because the CEDET merge already involves an uncomfortably
> large
> amount of code, and it's rather dismaying to see these two big code
> trees "embedded" in subdirectories of Semantic. (Wisent, for
> instance,
> appears to be an entire Elisp reimplementation of Bison...)
>
> Is it possible to use Bison itself rather than implement the
> same functionality differently? Or perhaps add an option
> to Bison to output its data in whatever format is convenient?
Guile is also using a translation/reimplementation of Bison in
Scheme. I haven't looked at the CEDET code, but Guile's version wants
the grammar input using Scheme (s-expression) syntax.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-06 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-05 16:28 CEDET merge question Chong Yidong
2009-09-05 17:22 ` David Engster
2009-09-05 20:53 ` Chong Yidong
2009-09-05 23:08 ` David Engster
2009-09-06 15:37 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-06 17:46 ` Ken Raeburn [this message]
2009-09-06 21:11 ` David Engster
2009-09-06 22:26 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-07 13:33 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-12 12:49 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-09-12 13:37 ` Miles Bader
2009-09-13 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-14 11:22 ` tomas
2009-09-14 12:15 ` Miles Bader
2009-09-14 20:04 ` tomas
2009-09-12 16:34 ` David Engster
2009-09-13 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-13 17:38 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-09-14 18:28 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-13 16:40 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-07 13:34 ` Richard Stallman
2009-09-08 8:11 ` joakim
2009-09-08 9:07 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-09-08 9:09 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-09-08 14:41 ` Chong Yidong
2009-09-08 15:10 ` joakim
2009-09-08 17:18 ` Chong Yidong
2009-09-08 21:21 ` Romain Francoise
2009-09-08 22:27 ` Chong Yidong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DDCB7204-3CE3-4A04-8623-9AB963A0C29D@raeburn.org \
--to=raeburn@raeburn.org \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).