From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuan Fu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:12:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87lfc5s9wg.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5xurt.fsf@igel.home> <87tuqtxtpw.fsf@igel.home> <83sg6d42o4.fsf@gnu.org> <1db01dbd-a1fd-7ea5-bf94-3462d0878e7f@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3372"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "rms@gnu.org" , "thibaut.verron@gmail.com" , "rpluim@gmail.com" , "ams@gnu.org" , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , "gregory@heytings.org" , "schwab@linux-m68k.org" , Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 18:17:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7LmQ-0000lQ-GZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:17:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56724 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7LmP-00010q-Db for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:17:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Li0-00045v-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qv1-xf29.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f29]:35750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lhy-0002VD-Qx; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qv1-xf29.google.com with SMTP id l14so324351qvp.2; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:12:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5KH+Bl82H+OB8XCheD3bQaYl0Yg9O8XnxafQ7DVVqYg=; b=j6dOqvP1HCpZ5i0JG940tju8dlIVSOyAfYwXZWgDPfHUsFSWRryxu9i9Bf1Sd/OYbt kRntxBqgJLqeBcYr1WO8yOL0sC5TRvfuPftQdiTaYdZ2PC7V02Ig8NdWVSm3t9t/uGK6 k3Ki3ZF9hd3ZsBe42Dc0MCqGGHZioNSfCz8wkiLEClxrcfaLcxTRnfUSwmBiH6M7iHss tOPtyuSaPsCFin7o/xXNwKoIEG1yHELHtdRydmkMvWOVZ589W66HRcDpY42dleHlVOvf fwPm1/gLh3wXZZxoOlErTcD1wvbUrwQNCYAo0D3csM7b8ovfLlHexWSvxwgpv1NdAz1s 41iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5KH+Bl82H+OB8XCheD3bQaYl0Yg9O8XnxafQ7DVVqYg=; b=EtSXzSOT5V1lFeTxo4B0SZAHjknWqDjiQ0te+W3jKct1Jm8590OU+gz0povNcJ6KB2 KJHazj/5zBlup8eHwPzRQcxqNNKIZD7BX9xttZjs+3hzFlCsHimvEx1ac/fiySIBJDOu KxhMZA7vnpl1CUFm90syzYrsyWnXs/BFULp0npXNzzMlOs1Wj9kIizd5WudzdxCqaJzh pANuvmbOSvAHWz4ApIYgNh6yCPnksN2rm74CDRrh0QE5O7by/nk0xoMyirRrvnZ9th6e 8lDFdj1k1+1HwAdcEcBdqxxiui8AibwAXgx9lvt+Pe1creJW8XT7xTO3YnRuYmHFYufY /1dA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ednG+yv7LhVs06wU9zg92Tfsf2PeGD9IWDRrnb7YHmvYic85F duX8SspYfCWnselyZRvxOFU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzk1433G03k1q2yGAEa9NYyhZcYDvByEpucps7iZBhippWcV7GBXXoO7jPQcBa6RC7/nZP2jQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b617:: with SMTP id f23mr3453803qve.44.1612372368925; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:12:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:98a:4200:9210:994b:448d:5677:d025? ([2601:98a:4200:9210:994b:448d:5677:d025]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b203sm2063389qkg.26.2021.02.03.09.12.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:12:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f29; envelope-from=casouri@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf29.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263814 Archived-At: I just want to addd that considering the amount of work and discussion = involved in removing or changing default key bindings, we shouldn=E2=80=99= t go too lightly on adding them. Yuan=