From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Theodor Thornhill Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:51:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83wno6p0op.fsf@gnu.org> <4FD0AA48-0E93-4E6A-BD65-C2E492322982@thornhill.no> <83zgt2ni07.fsf@gnu.org> <30BD0CDB-17B9-45DB-A77D-DA57E8535032@thornhill.no> <83k0k6neqq.fsf@gnu.org> <83czpxorb7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3987"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, danflscr@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 11:53:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJv1r-0000na-Cx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:53:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43768 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJv1p-00009D-L5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJv0R-0007t9-Nn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from out0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:267::]:51601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJv0M-0003ZD-Lk; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:52:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thornhill.no; s=key1; t=1630144317; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IjO6S/kFWeHj/MidU3P4kA5MMR0/gvsi+YpDHvBLYoY=; b=MUoVzIMWguOz4S79LVXC1qZaYK9XhEm9Bb4AHV2AKDOJzv+aXecPvJbSGR5WdfgTu1Vjp1 oSc8hYoxOTSqM77ONE3NtyFFgBw2Gs0uEL5tD9VWVg3FwKrGwUIRhvoAZryvo+R+AaSkJd 5MMkJ5uR7zchBRMCTZMuRFTwrPl5hiprW/bAgCq+zx+b3GJLI8WvE9etAAWZT4SnAXTJu1 ULGM34GGU93noq14ZYqvVvFvtpqlBl+yep3niYNQI+wWy5+MvmOW2LRMVn5lIKMB8M2WZ0 XAdTCUqOCIKOsocDFjLthUSKdp8MOIsZrsMzov7HLarOdhLog0CbonU+fH8A2Q== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. In-Reply-To: <83czpxorb7.fsf@gnu.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: theo@thornhill.no Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:2:267::; envelope-from=theo@thornhill.no; helo=out0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273268 Archived-At: On 28 August 2021 11:24:12 CEST, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:00:36 +0200 >> From: Theodor Thornhill >> CC: dgutov@yandex=2Eru, monnier@iro=2Eumontreal=2Eca, philipk@posteo=2E= net, >> danflscr@gmail=2Ecom, emacs-devel@gnu=2Eorg >>=20 >> >> Yeah, not sure what these requirements are, though, apart from the p= r workflow being recognizable across many GitHub derivatives=2E=20 >> > >> >I think these are basically the various important aspects of the PR >> >Web-based workflow=2E >>=20 >> If that's the case I'd say it is covered=2E > >Dmitry seems to think otherwise, and he gave examples of such >features, to which you agreed=2E > I agreed on some of it yes, and demonstrated where he was wrong=2E The thi= ngs I noted as missing it mostly different: - editing a comment require a new email - subsequent iterations on a patch isn't squashed in the web UI The last one may be a bummer, but not sure if it is=2E In my opinion this = shouldn't tester contributions, but who knows=2E=20 >> But it is different=2E And in my experience people have a hard time wit= h different=2E But if inching a little closer to what GitHub does it our go= al, then I'd say SourceHut covers it=2E If making it more accessible to web= folks is the goal, we will get more than halfway=2E Is that enough? No idea= =2E > >We need to established whether it's enough, and if it isn't, either >look for a better alternative, or somehow make sure SourceHut gets >closer=2E Drew is very responsive, and I think getting input on what a real, old Fos= s projects needs would be important=2E Can't speak on his behalf though