From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master ff9ddda: Simplify pre-write-conversion for utf-8-hfs coding system Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:12:21 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20160610080445.616.81209@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160610080445.5113D220143@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465809314 23277 80.91.229.3 (13 Jun 2016 09:15:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 13 11:15:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bCNxh-0003ph-9J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:15:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54591 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCNxg-00087L-C2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCNvH-0006d4-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:12:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCNvC-0003lb-Aq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:12:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::244]:36368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCNv1-0003jk-Gl; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:12:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x244.google.com with SMTP id fg1so10108649pad.3; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:12:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YFYmUaVTfJcuL3YtmQtO2ZC79TIfRndWIk8UbZ9wjHA=; b=Se3VJNxJTwTikL06dQK61QwR/xuAU9qP8OvfeVlBHm7iF2dgIHoqyM4oczCc1SQjre QU7iN0o++V2sn5eDMUYud/UvTrvD3C+URxwzSb3g52LlXFKP/6ZscU1xb2j3aoLto6vt uHG9G1B8aAiXd9ygnMdLhFU00X2Y8JIt2WRo5LzFT2qc8qKx5ZiQ1Iy/kRQkkJvxRAOw /YKhs1PGzXYsAlX02M90lKGM0ojfEx5mfQUGaN70Zz+7inVl3kkn6f0XBE/BYeNI6+3N jrp78X4ufo4J/E+Q7WQNb98dBZiZlFTdvUI1cC0CyUfxTQp2OG3lfXpavtq0BPlV0wes ZJ8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YFYmUaVTfJcuL3YtmQtO2ZC79TIfRndWIk8UbZ9wjHA=; b=THi7wSgAGWq67fXTRd9n+mo1GUbh2yP4+0Uu2f9BlPodXwCZvgBaacFo6coWHNJBZr OFP5hjqUFf+8wGK4oX8koDIwVJrTpn+65ekChtQuRJ3ZKplm4kagnbfUali9pDxMf77h pcyIFf9OvMIZekr3dccVDxGWmMPL9MHgmWmeENSWn+mziDPvyqgblIbJHoVGFpR/uHEJ 8AgljLukQDVZNVPmYKvfeOn8cOGJNFvqgCPx8eWyYXLlXGhjLAY862NFsPFk0pZNscy5 NaFXTSIseFOqBQ5DUiedE3z3yF9eoESUI5bCcGCQiuVeHKz+I6a6ZQejyY1B3r69qOat b9rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL1HzYkBX5turVAlFCYbblZWtDGTcVal088tbABxTMMiR+iGPbVAlaeAAFv1fjAGw== X-Received: by 10.66.165.40 with SMTP id yv8mr21404044pab.89.1465809146598; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.13] ([180.249.130.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm25624272pav.33.2016.06.13.02.12.24 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:12:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::244 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204330 Archived-At: On Jun 10, 2016, at 11:54 PM, Stefan Monnier = wrote: > Could you add a comment explaining why it's OK to ignore `from` and = `to` > here (as well as rename those args to `_from` and `_to` to make it > clear to the byte-compiler that we purposefully ignore them)? I could, and I have. Is it okay to commit this bug fix in emacs-25? (Is cherry-picking of the two commits okay for this purpose?)