From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew DeVault" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:49:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8d0be260-7b15-0b48-42e5-e5a4cc203e54@yandex.ru> <9b839e28-e406-ff4d-0c1e-0bdb9d397f96@yandex.ru> <67fac1e5-4351-ed12-92c2-cec5103fbd95@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14111"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: theo@thornhill.no, Philip Kaludercic , danflscr@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Dmitry Gutov" , "Lars Ingebrigtsen" , "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 14:51:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKglV-0003MB-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:51:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50616 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKglU-0003oU-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:51:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKgjj-0001FU-6H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from out1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:863f::]:32410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKgjh-0006xT-Ia; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:50:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpwn.com; s=key1; t=1630327798; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=94XVoj8R6YM6PZZ6RwS0cy13W55MZMAk71qipSih4WQ=; b=SqEiVE6NebtsKAQYZgBybCSuv/U6j43s7LDxMzAuGRuXGTgoiCsK43nefrWNLt6fWVt54d qhLh5IF0rLMiDSjOnj7xEBWwHLIMQBqXviKVIQ5eTnnjH7sbhwNr6VK/LUT27FuHEKSa6x qu9ns+RgdUmUiAkYiZ82oA6FJ9oDKnwbOkUSrhDbhFHnGd4yrWuVzkD0hThdgu8sRFrX2K 0ugIIJDu0kZ6nYSGRRWwoJqxQg3a59j/ZEx3G2GSyKxCifbten1FXu3aS5uhsKIoOEekE1 +miyYhe8umyqBlwxqmuIjVHGOyYtakFPoDXQUIPtOGJELWzWhLuqv+UlUo7G3Q== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. In-Reply-To: <67fac1e5-4351-ed12-92c2-cec5103fbd95@yandex.ru> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: sir@cmpwn.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:2:863f::; envelope-from=sir@cmpwn.com; helo=out1.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273485 Archived-At: On Mon Aug 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM CEST, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > This is about sender identity verification, right? No chance to delegate > that responsibility to the SourceHut instance? > > If the web interface allows users to create patchset email on behalf of > the user, or even send messages to the mailing list from the web UI (not > sure if such feature is present, but there will be a demand for it), you > are already creating emails on their behalf anyway. We find it important to preserve the original integrity of the email. This is important for a robust and reliable mail system. > Will that affect only replies to later emails? Yes.