From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Paul W. Rankin" via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:48:12 +1000 Message-ID: References: <936DFE4B-B16D-45A2-A6C2-AF13C451BF39@bydasein.com> <87tup1dk63.fsf@gnus.org> <20210324085114.GC30513@tuxteam.de> <164F3FEC-FBD2-4BD7-A6C4-BD195DC54D50@gnu.org> Reply-To: "Paul W. Rankin" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24603"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 25 06:50:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lPIsa-0006GP-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:50:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPIsZ-000855-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPIrK-0007aR-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:48:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]:41786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPIrI-0007dO-F8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:48:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=qyW9LtmHWAMSutCcTR01A4K5fDmGhPiu1vTMmQzufc+QmCX5H2r6/z4tvpDSywaOOHiqQIbVJQAit2YxUhFvOP/g3JAu02toAkzGXYJCXV6mvNWy0wuqvbPbxpMUyzEm5uLgbr1TRB5A1FrzRGaXYoAJrTWIjnIxJUSXOer454IhWmdo5m6IXICjPBvvsx45iWnDdJjVzZy9PBm7BMz105m7MWiBaGHZVjibJ/KfXM/r9H0CjdkigUoVxXX5G2fL9YtSZ8IIeWl2Pkf0SQcbrw4eFCvF4LRY3a0rp+xaFUrL8C/OXEF42TsXkI8BaXts8HthkSQIgO7lCTfYPtX+eg==; s=purelymail2; d=bydasein.com; v=1; bh=SEzVGMcM0iwMUKq4uOC/E3VsCPYLY2HYJh7Zj6FlAUQ=; h=Received:From:To; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=ZoskyV1/TCyggwt+Y8gHUC0E4275nhJQOXAXp0L/kEvdN3Qzqr8meJdYZ7KIJiqhYObsnTnHHXnGfWggR1dUunSg5/P1eurUzms5y38vMHaWdBRtziJhKVdIqrTXawnWgkmSTGoQpUeP9W+oQ5rXmDPt/0nq4LpiwUM3ACNSeQoeZtBOSpfwU5Szi5JVcQzQwdPXTPjhaUwsN7X98YB6NixxbwrhuXF9ZBJTW6APAJY81UiRsmcLSd4yEEC3USF2WoxGk47cpETrMPWZ/ylh7Va9mcdiKPBQaS47qf9VEs+SLJ9PEEqDX5eft19IEB2iqVFyJw5y4zNkV4sxdDN6aw==; s=purelymail2; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=SEzVGMcM0iwMUKq4uOC/E3VsCPYLY2HYJh7Zj6FlAUQ=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:From:To; Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: by ip-172-30-0-247.ec2.internal (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID -370139275; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:48:17 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=34.202.193.197; envelope-from=pwr@bydasein.com; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267002 Archived-At: > On 25 Mar 2021, at 3:14 pm, Richard Stallman wrote: >=20 > Instead of disputing who is more wrong, how about if we simply try to > make the discussion kind from now on? Hmm thought it was clear satire, which I never thought of as = kind/unkind... Illustrating how an individual's personal preference when = applied universally can easily reach absurdity... Or the "sane defaults" meme taken to its logical conclusions.