From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: trunk not building on OSX Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <861umlqy35.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <0D7BCAD4-304D-403D-88A5-85E079259720@swipnet.se> <86likskmbq.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337242295 9877 80.91.229.3 (17 May 2012 08:11:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 17 10:11:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUvo4-0004Ty-L4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUvo3-0001P9-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUvo0-0001P1-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUvnx-0005HX-Vl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:11:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:38745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUvnx-0005HL-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2012 04:11:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA23933A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 18248 invoked by uid 89); 17 May 2012 09:07:08 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-18.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.18) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 17 May 2012 09:07:08 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C62EA7FA06C; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <86likskmbq.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 62.20.26.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150540 Archived-At: Hello. I had a similar experiece on GNU/Linux about a year ago. Dumping Emacs = would randomly crash with a segmentation violation. Just running make = again usually worked. Turns out bad RAM was the cause. Could this be similar? Jan D. 16 maj 2012 kl. 20:33 skrev Randal L. Schwartz: >>>>>> "Jan" =3D=3D Jan Dj=E4rv writes: >=20 > Jan> Hello. > Jan> I do not have this problem. How do you configure Emacs? >=20 > This was a weird problem, and I think there's still a problem somehow. >=20 > I did a git bisect between the version the day before, and the broken > version. Each time, I did a "git clean -f -x" which wipes everything > but the commit, and: >=20 > ./autogen.sh > ./configure --with-ns --without-x --without-dbus \ > --with-jpeg=3Dno --with-gif=3Dno --with-tiff=3Dno --prefix=3D/tmp/emacs= >=20 > to configure, followed by "make clean bootstrap install" to build. >=20 > Now the weird part. Every single one I did, worked just fine. > So the bisect told me the "last good commit" was in fact the one = before > the origin/master. >=20 > On a whim, I built origin/master again... and this time it worked. >=20 > It should not have. I was unable to get it to *fail* as it had = earlier, > even though I was building exactly the same way. >=20 > Is there some part of the build running in parallel, and I was running > into timing issues? I've actually seen this error before, but only > sporadically. >=20 > --=20 > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 = 0095 > > Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion >=20