From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Paul W. Rankin" via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'M-o' ('facemap-keymap') has now been removed until March 10th 2021 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:33:58 +1000 Message-ID: References: <32A55BBD-1A3F-4EC4-817F-7C3408C22A65@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddac64397c7d@heytings.org> <4B2A00EB-8C04-4B9D-BA86-692D67207AFD@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddc2bf87fd3a@heytings.org> <0009872A-AD9D-4B08-B714-BFEDDAAF9125@bydasein.com> <8786a8e8faf45a989904@heytings.org> <8786a8e8faa6f278b198@heytings.org> Reply-To: "Paul W. Rankin" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5717"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 24 10:36:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOzvk-0001Mu-53 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:36:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOzvj-0001v7-6I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 05:35:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOzuO-0001Jw-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 05:34:37 -0400 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]:42590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOzuN-0001aQ-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 05:34:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=EvlVzbe8NzEfwH1uGPjJOjAYSf0rHZG1/AbTXPUT047J2krmYC6QtTMJp3CVZHFFBjYwTPFd2UWiNKUxm67ZFIE8KM0hgjkSd8s7+MKF14tGeLqHNwXSe2HDj7dmfb6JdernL3r/9E6wx6EMwsHjVhbwWHmdHDhTogvvxnIK+KZ6/2k69d2WbSw7hg17ZmpkcN1BmLN/59CsV86BjAKhHLQFN000nzDpOuuSz0PT6K91GtNPV+QNx34msoIK45yM25LSSMLwpLhMvWb1GkxSfgEAucggRI8ZPYXIubAohk0GKXf3E/wTgG5Mc/zgsS//zgNJ+N+dreJLFkArpaKuFA==; s=purelymail2; d=bydasein.com; v=1; bh=tMeyxmFxZM7eff3f86e57W6I0aADO5A9X2Hz1SEUz+M=; h=Received:From:To; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=mg1yNrkevTX1ueurzqAs46N01fyHD5TLVMe6nU26Spt7TMont2+DkUXaZxsdHfYOx1SLBF/iitHj2pSJDJtkRXZirxkJIJrAUC4cNuDsrpjA6x/Glz3LcovjJIBs6cL6b1LUPm6EKVHbKw6MLzdH7hcPCupuyn1fSNIuuTtXdoUqXYwHAQx4wr0kYiz36/YPqsk7WX2nm6OEcsqMNoxyI/9KF6AnBNoDPDQpL2zfHD+S8TA+DAIHBQo0ObbzMEmLx4EbIbBe1mB4sQfsKZ+DIIpIW6uuT7QuHCmq1M/Ia4OKKL933/QQwg859dsFvoL9nS1Fsj/EqtFxHcLrEnOfPw==; s=purelymail2; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=tMeyxmFxZM7eff3f86e57W6I0aADO5A9X2Hz1SEUz+M=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:From:To; Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: by ip-172-30-0-124.ec2.internal (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID 267047686; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:34:03 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <8786a8e8faa6f278b198@heytings.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=34.202.193.197; envelope-from=pwr@bydasein.com; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266938 Archived-At: > - with a prefix argument, toggle font-lock-mode "correctly" (i.e. = making sure that the buffer is unfontified when disabling) This part is what shouldn't be in there. Calling = `font-lock-unfontify-region' is the nuclear option to remove all text = properties, including those that font lock doesn't "own", so to speak. = As I mentioned before, I think you're getting confused about how = font-lock and text properties work, and so what you're saying is = "correct" is not so. Deactivating font-lock-mode does not and should not = remove all text properties -- only those with the `(fontified . t)' = property.