From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:17:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <9031b3534bc714b3d062@heytings.org> <20210203005642.pi7wskwdl5fld5vu@Ergus> <83zh0l4yoz.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203035824.pf2ynykhqeuglsjd@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1390"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 06:18:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7AYT-0000F8-K9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:18:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50540 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7AYS-0008BO-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:18:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7AXm-0007lR-1M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:17:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7AXl-0008Ta-Lv; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a02:14f:80:8d61::1] (port=45230) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7AXl-0007H8-33; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:17:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20210203035824.pf2ynykhqeuglsjd@Ergus> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263770 Archived-At: On February 3, 2021 5:58:24 AM GMT+02:00, Ergus wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 05:28:28AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 01:56:42 +0100 > >> From: Ergus > >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu=2Eorg > >> > >> But Eli, Stefan, Lars=2E=2E=2E Do you approve this change? At least > revert the > >> binding? > > > >Which change? what binding? > > > Commit: 7d15fa008af774789a91d7242055dc87497df66f >=20 > All this thread is because of that=2E This thread seems to be about a lot of things, including whether it's okay= for 3rd party packages to use C-x SOME-LETTER, and even whether the Emacs = developers are doing their job well enough=2E As for that particular commit: the discussion is still unfolding, and it i= sn't yet clear to me whether there's consensus or what it is=2E Some say t= hat Magit was wrong in using "C-x g" to begin with, others (including yours= elf?) are okay with having "C-x g" globally bound to revert-buffer if we ad= d to that more global bindings starting with "C-x g"=2E And most of the po= ints you raised in your OP didn't yet get any responses=2E So from my POV it's too early to make up my mind about this=2E Lars obvio= usly didn't think the new binding was terribly wrong, or else he wouldn't h= ave committed that change=2E And Stefan started a new thread to discuss a = related but separate issue=2E So I think we should wait and see if some consensus emerges out of this di= scussion=2E