From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuri Khan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 23:22:40 +0600 Message-ID: References: <64a52598-ad53-498c-993c-67d7827dbdfc@default> <838u1uuuau.fsf@gnu.org> <878u1um2xl.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87fuw090k7.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y49spuxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov4achc.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <83r3fkpb3u.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh5rps0t.fsf@gnu.org> <56E066BD.5050403@cs.ucla.edu> <83wpp9jt82.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov1dje9.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <83pouyfk6k.fsf@gnu.org> <9174d641-9f3f-6c03-2383-a4d5b7ac4f10@yandex.ru> <834mcafgco.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457889813 11365 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2016 17:23:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , "rms@gnu.org" , Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 18:23:32 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1af9jo-0008BP-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:23:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36919 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9jn-0003rX-Ga for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:23:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9jL-0003IC-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9jK-0005Dz-Ac for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]:35640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af9jK-0005Do-2j; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x234.google.com with SMTP id bc4so211721939lbc.2; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 10:23:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BV/DkDRHl06QrOly/2TommanvgUIk7odNKL5EIyIna0=; b=Q5zM/yUTDLFAUWpxb3WUg31stagAjUTYrQyuhepm6VydentyF1mqfs1l50m9TjT6z7 Mu1MiwPDSSLGMrbMFau+qOAJtymD8h5iigCHdIEZWLFt+CGfNR+quy/oZxRpye50f1ad CEng7E8SCaogtK90pU58612gK/tlNRqnonKJ8wPo4ndK/wQCC5igLYdybBzFuyd0DPb8 fGmw4xArfnMI8R1z/aokZIQvvVPmPG40a6xG048nlfyrbHARxm1ygbjL2hVpe4mI1ffy Y16pMzgwVbKJ7Aia5LpLrciTZHI8QAKan8SzjJ0SFaNLAvRdw8+oojypWstWN2rMCGUg rT0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BV/DkDRHl06QrOly/2TommanvgUIk7odNKL5EIyIna0=; b=ATAGP5YLexAXOXKW77Ha+cYC7hyzIhy/a1oPus4c2wSkwkT54O5c5PHQ9geDNi8sbY WFWOtr1WyWD5TwFStlLsYPwrawMYusYio3gsVEz/9K6AKzf35RSkD0GAnSaLzVljoOwm yh/JuvbBoZhm2c4I8qi/YbIcEn7pp9T9uVCv334WLwrpfpjI4qNWC0DKaEQDE3f6ZRVG TCJ1r2lrnjQZPLTWFlcZpgAyZg8jF4CitPlaXDZUB0mPK7gee/nrY+S/CKX0lGdRQ0Q6 tqgw4WlpKN7api3NcWvsk7dEMBZYCx1dCYRiqigqN9rl2zpN/EUZeX26PmmELBhgzMo/ Zzaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIDbpUjykSeI9/gi2DxBXzGAvxFQkwAd7OnMnrApn+c0I0MTgAvz+0DqgynMMDtbGXcppLD09h2zO8dag== X-Received: by 10.113.3.6 with SMTP id bs6mr6467731lbd.114.1457889780785; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 10:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.112.254.164 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 10:22:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <834mcafgco.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: yZmSciBWhezYh3xYmdPdLG7TRU0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201614 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> On 03/13/2016 05:53 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > As for the >> > latter, I think quite a few people who track the development and >> > contribute patches do that, so I think it's important for their >> > workflows to be undisturbed. >> >> If a person can rebase, they can fix the commit message while doing >> that. There's no point is supporting an alternative mechanism there. > > No, I mean the messages corrected in commits by others. Commits by others do not typically occur on branches which are socially accepted as rebasable. The only case I can think of is when you cherry-pick someone=E2=80=99s commit into your feature branch while tha= t commit had been corrected. Is that the case you have in mind?