From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Yuri Khan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: init_system_name fqdn? Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 21:33:05 +0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497623622 23697 195.159.176.226 (16 Jun 2017 14:33:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Ken Olum Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 16 16:33:33 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLsJY-0005fQ-85 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:33:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLsJd-0006uz-JN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44485) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLsJW-0006tz-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLsJV-0004qo-4y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:33:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]:37969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLsJU-0004q0-VC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u195so13537986wmd.1 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=BgSLFVy5YuPUwZR8t1Kc7K9zN/xGb7jBppg5oU4naw0=; b=sOlSvGmoABVB59nYzxD3v4is9QornEP10/b1pxHD64LR7LLsPDAZyLu8TcewPA8soD e42bAl9CWQxue3T8ZE5a5WZdZuo4p/OPkwZqA2UCePNiWjjYJCeRPFxjNCSyj31VRJzp OWVCW5SOZ+5n2k69m+Nt5hClyUOTFM7RNwqWCMo+m04Hnr4eHsJo+E0F4KNSVo+AuY98 Kv/uxeH0RTcOEf+ClndzFRra4MGsUdYn3err8Y5zdJCfwBNHvSADCDB1aO6z81SFQdlx iu2usCTCmINnuw0DQTFSY0Ywp6DxYrTGsIjVb9YWRr3jU2k2h7dRb3+Q4AAFWRgokZmm UpoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BgSLFVy5YuPUwZR8t1Kc7K9zN/xGb7jBppg5oU4naw0=; b=C+nyLjYAHxBUE8KlthtsvhrPKSOQgpJjjCeQMeKdkkwvpYgFJbSDtZ/KGegmTro1tG AoBB52loKc8I6NMSNlNdJgqHpEIPZMJKxY9aGnNE9SmFWvXrsYYORfwoXnFTpXHHR9P+ RNVkNVmkJjHipyFMkvRjLsP+wzxxzQpwt+zZfzSc60nIX2SdeLvJZ/lQY3lj2CB44UIS WCsMhxWAPGPTbdUMaojFXU8aDsqnqtpwV1cnz1RqFWe7nGVmgA2EQ6bTZ12NuI9DCxyP 3VXigBfc86dijgOMmXnDcJukbw1sOtExk8jvJp8/3vnZA9z9GU4Qju5VZ4C4rRaWUhV0 YDYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxGElgn2sIw4HjgAjEL/B6UGN8pXudGfBuV92qyLAJcAMbJO7Bm p8Ayxec4D9HgBfiVDsj/66XYKwCWwQ== X-Received: by 10.28.74.218 with SMTP id n87mr7562062wmi.16.1497623606392; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.223.164.93 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:33:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: RQh2jDK4rL9sv0zTIL4m5j1-_dY X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215671 Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Ken Olum wrote: > A while back, init_system_name tried to find the system's fully > qualified domain name. Then this code was taken out, and now it just > uses whatever gethostname returns. I think this is a poor choice. Many > systems are configured without a fully qualified hostname. Even if they are, they are not likely to be able to receive email at their configured FQDN.