From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Akira Kyle Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing the `window-id' frame parameter on non-Core Input platforms Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:49:18 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87y24ifpkj.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87y24ifpkj.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmps3r0h.fsf@yahoo.com> <87lf0g3qt3.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wnk02bdq.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ee673mwd.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33004"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 20 23:51:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRUu-0008Qt-Dn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:51:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRUt-0006cL-EA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:51:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRTJ-0004xr-DZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:49:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com ([209.85.167.51]:43528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzRTH-00064u-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 17:49:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id i31so9777247lfv.10 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:49:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fVYuU+0tkfWW0g13xLd2V5XShipnCmyvHvAIu9lWjzA=; b=q8fiAXE3YOF/bi8C3oPZYq4+mOf8/ZgQ5/7Dhs0o3Z1nWpkMxcpebGkSZ0O1nCpGc4 LrSGiFhHTaaTkZzoqKlEZ/E9VPitte7MAurdA24MJ4F2SbG13EqHJA0siXP2IjCsxIEi IXYaHOwY+/aHK0Xfi7MyjU4ERsvdWNxTja9UifKMlaDlL8iuGMHedHYiGqzWR9tOOB78 eRE71WThHZ7nHtJy7KKPBxpuW+IVso+Z5ihRCDebxb6zb42xwMRBdzhwTNYZMG+dCOhh wfFD0nyE2KrZxxGj8bvW114CduBqFusuCM3fJtDM/Ghck7f2fV87orL8QzR8JtAUT8pt /+4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uKnxwdFH4Fzo/PXdRLFNs6WdFrLw7xrAYqc5pDwFrPRw1+VU2 Cva294VY7DdwHr8DFv0w0GZlN6Pj+DnCtg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQbUwNxuOnR0TZsOBT37g/Oreq78Oi5ndlDR9RR3lQ6GrPLIz8mLJZqHHOfznP/6LuNrw24A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:98d:: with SMTP id w13mr294275lft.577.1640040570015; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:49:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com (mail-lf1-f47.google.com. [209.85.167.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm2499421lfe.219.2021.12.20.14.49.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:49:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id g26so9233097lfv.11 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:49:29 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1324:: with SMTP id x36mr323822lfu.141.1640040569217; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:49:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ee673mwd.fsf@yahoo.com> X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.167.51; envelope-from=aikokyle@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-f51.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282544 Archived-At: On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 9:45 PM Po Lu wrote: > > Akira Kyle writes: > > > I would disagree. To fit the Emacs display model I think xwidget > > webkit buffers should behave the same as eww buffers, where one can > > independently scroll two windows containing the same buffer (ie one > > could view the content at the top of a page in one buffer and the > > content at the bottom in another which can be very useful). > > Why is that so? xwidgets aren't text, they're special display elements > like images. But even with a buffer showing an image, I can scroll it independently in two windows, so xwidgets don't even behave like images. I would expect displaying an HTML document that only contains unformatted text to behave similarly in both eww and xwidgets webkit with respect to scrolling the document. The current behavior of xwidget webkit with respect to scrolling doesn't appear to me to have any analog to anything else in emacs, perhaps the closet would be follow-mode if the two windows displayed the same buffer location.