From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Copley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unexmacosx.c and limits.h problem Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:38:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17A5977B-7474-4740-BEC7-CFF27E57FC73@play-bow.org> <83d1k24vvr.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmzm4v50.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474112371 13370 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2016 11:39:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bob Halley , Paul Eggert , Emacs Development To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 13:39:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blDxe-0001Oa-M1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:39:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45692 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDxc-0007mN-Tu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDxS-0007lE-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDxR-00070B-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]:34470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDxN-0006vT-Tg; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:38:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g9so62344466vkg.1; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:38:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MOv6003N4WGCCrmJpYPBL48F6fTl8ImtrbGdJ0kg8E8=; b=CDkxlLJBeN9dWpyzVV1wUFEG+r0Cbp80pmyuMNI3yuzHbS/44kUxjNiHHUuEId15N6 Kgc6Ha4YCDhScR9Mdn2OGlilEi/wZ/1HJIEMoXmxntd8A0E9BvM0WUE0UencOX3Uho69 R0ISOKjVIblaTx7vixHfiMFgaw37wdYwkARcXaBNEaPDq0KUkndD1yyrmkB6RVmRRYZW gWQETVxiBAhFOVBVBxofrF9qrfbA8ul445+9Q2Te0qggeWOkssOtXOrwCStGelllHu1s 6EdfYsyc4FY3zev7QvWKbUqRbhG01/s2WCzs1Tz0U7QqtzuOBtRCFF1VFwFhHDWA/KOs rCPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MOv6003N4WGCCrmJpYPBL48F6fTl8ImtrbGdJ0kg8E8=; b=BUGMNrfa6noVKxoQePZ7HArscxzJ39nNv2/A6gqo4a97FqzS6/T1se5C5S+PbETTxc Hf1GjPc9Z57DFqYy8jzxTunQ2hS9vCXQxA6xCTKHdtxAsL3p8+cHnprXfvB/GIr9eV2t vtxsbPzZU2xHHWNOwILJWiRXrW8anezjPPtmGCbslEEKgTqhpafltOGIkXTrPWa4wE3z a1JwZEvMWY7DPbqAk+AGgrLxUqBECrEzGsvDPBeyJW6Z6X3Vdjlb6DuYvAUeYhGTR2os YNlxAadFQWPZcdA6637TKrD8PL1sYPBwjeM5lPAz1dDcNcTy8e+BKc6KbYy2kctMlmXj veIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMalY6NnUWRu/hu2VYnS8J5WfaU+2kdy6bYdQjUwGfugniLrpZN2CvENHY6jNfkuloE/DNVfcYPEjmMeg== X-Received: by 10.31.84.129 with SMTP id i123mr8010177vkb.126.1474112333479; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.176.82.176 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:38:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83bmzm4v50.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207480 Archived-At: On 17 September 2016 at 12:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> The Windows build is broken too (with MSYS2), presumably for a similar >> >> reason. >> > >> > It isn't broken here. Can you show the error messages? >> >> Sure, give me a few minutes. Did you reconfigure? You need the >> generated limits.h. > > The configure script runs automatically when you say "make" in the > top-level directory. And yes, limit.h was recreated. > > I just re-run autogen.sh and the configure script, to make sure -- no > errors in sight. > > What GCC version do you have? I refer the honourable gentleman ...