From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Copley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unexmacosx.c and limits.h problem Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:03:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17A5977B-7474-4740-BEC7-CFF27E57FC73@play-bow.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474110246 26158 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2016 11:04:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bob Halley , Emacs Development To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 13:04:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blDPY-0005YS-Go for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:03:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDPV-0003AC-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:03:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDPP-0003A5-Oy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDPN-0008Hf-Sf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]:36860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blDPN-0008HJ-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 07:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m62so62750299vkd.3 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:03:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oDktrjts1m5RgT0tW11q+bq3Y2p37++sFTHT/UTA5WQ=; b=E16w7glRYT9gTD06EEXO2DuEejJ7eIF3F1gVyZ1htybWfIqG+FiTSbCWx5+WcIUG+L HXeIj3OMA9hpf8UwSEn6Sf/rCuHVf3Ybg5nH7vob+XX2cWlvFzihox6Ux7DDE+VCFlG/ R0d2EHxGKYg0LzyTt+TsucrLmLppJwWXI+jVagt1MMWlqQrRBt6zuIppxyiAIqROfjYo +6AfP6CpEST1cJY/NbDFq+/gBDzkYlCGGxNP50kpCfNzWv6pw2y/nwgyYKkFGPr1OnBJ QaBHaSzPsXmFNQa9pD9SfJVRFrEt4HXjkcLBxqHjVqkeeR94jKLwC/4tqZIg3p1KgcVD KxTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oDktrjts1m5RgT0tW11q+bq3Y2p37++sFTHT/UTA5WQ=; b=CmScRXVqMPqVGfB4Qgf3BRSUhEXg71IMyDjaYY8UFnzCeZm3yvWbuuiivh9pMnn3l3 JjOtoLp3ZhR8AwlgXGaDSU/3yUFjaFZm6pDQ4SejTWp0z2Ty5pP/x5qvuQg0StcJiPgx zUE7naLipxTjQUe0pTq5d2BzvABq9WzXbCbjVB+74iTtp0Ec5snzqr1EOyToY7vpks6S /lBjnly3nGd2N+7xccyUmTE1HdBaulvKAi8Y6SlRpeFtQKV+WLaq2+kH1F6q3OalI/Jz kReJztTKN/YIKImz9jMNLZV1W3p1p3PwkAv7QqktZ1EiAlxiN3joXOuSNtaCfIStYlqq 0QHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPqK9u6M2TvasDX1VKO3lzIHoh4A5TwE393Jf6WUbC2VvjRxCd3nvGsqFz1xkTDH2fyx9vVMBUECZdQ2A== X-Received: by 10.31.235.67 with SMTP id j64mr6014298vkh.45.1474110225060; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.176.82.176 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:03:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207475 Archived-At: On 17 September 2016 at 02:02, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 09/16/2016 04:04 PM, Bob Halley wrote: >> >> +#ifndef _GNU_SOURCE >> +#define _GNU_SOURCE 1 >> +#endif > > > Thanks, I installed that into Emacs master. The Windows build is broken too (with MSYS2), presumably for a similar reason. Adding those same three preprocessor directives before the includes of in "w32.c" and "w32_proc.c" is enough to let the build succeed.