From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows: Emacs 24.1 binary size vs 24.2 binary size Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 06:26:18 -0600 Message-ID: References: <503D7C5B.4080701@gmail.com> <504219DA.20309@gmail.com> <83pq65g5lx.fsf@gnu.org> <83oblelbs5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303b3a5786ff7104c9581064 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347280009 11823 80.91.229.3 (10 Sep 2012 12:26:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 10 14:26:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TB34e-0005zz-CC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:26:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TB34a-0008Cd-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:26:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TB34T-0008BO-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:26:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TB34K-0007yz-9h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:39556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TB34E-0007wi-UA; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: by qcsd16 with SMTP id d16so1171187qcs.0 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 05:26:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5+FF2gLa3SbTUf8E5BGZkxRxZesASfzBHx/vCTbwCT8=; b=SfWpHhsTG6AodDrmRD6wL7FfUv1eNMSx9bSrXLdAvMCBH0a3PqaTaTX46gHOoMFs1x BvGM6LC9IHGEIdbZQfBxf+cs/jQvWN1Xd3EIg0QTbxCpxl4EVdNmCwQolafCuhkN6L4i Jl/febUFpuxoJg3rx4kdH49xEQivVaye5+6DYlu9aW3ZErmArRIpdbj8ITnZ1+s8Ayt4 C7dbi7Dmxv3QtbzZw1HsbqRiL+mIqnqbgqT6ow8KLQl2IKP2jpV2Rg6IdRDcbIrtb4EW IgP4XuAWnaolwRuatgZY+Na6t++IzwdybbVt3Y/4Q3+2vaH1xKY9TluXiGavJnbnQMvU sMBg== Original-Received: by 10.224.185.5 with SMTP id cm5mr15463129qab.87.1347279978430; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 05:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.49.50.8 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 05:26:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83oblelbs5.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.216.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153212 Archived-At: --20cf303b3a5786ff7104c9581064 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > None whatsoever. This revision changes a few lines in a single > function, see the diffs below. None of the changes should cause or > prevent loading of some other package, AFAICS. > > IOW, it all sounds like some obscure bug triggered indirectly either > by previous versions or by the new version. Beats me how, though. > > One way to explore this further would be to dump the pure space in the > 2 builds and compare them. I don't know of any convenient method of > doing that. I will dig around some more as time permits. > In any case, I don't think you should delay the 24.2 binaries any > more. I'm using 24.2 every day since the release, on 2 different > machines, and didn't see any problems. OK. I will upload the 24.2 tonight. Thanks. --20cf303b3a5786ff7104c9581064 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Eli Zaretskii <= span dir=3D"ltr"><eliz= @gnu.org> wrote:
None whatsoever. =A0This revision changes a few lines in a single
function, see the diffs below. =A0None of the changes should cause or
prevent loading of some other package, AFAICS.

IOW, it all sounds like some obscure bug triggered indirectly either
by previous versions or by the new version. =A0Beats me how, though.

One way to explore this further would be to dump the pure space in the
2 builds and compare them. =A0I don't know of any convenient method of<= br> doing that.

I will dig around some more as = time permits.
=A0
In any case, I don't think you should delay the 24.2 binaries any
more. =A0I'm using 24.2 every day since the release, on 2 different
machines, and didn't see any problems.

= OK. I will upload the 24.2 tonight.

Thanks.=A0
--20cf303b3a5786ff7104c9581064--