Re: bug#38912: 27.0.60; PDumper meets segmentation fault when evil is loaded

[Pip Cet <pipcet@gmail.com>]

Summary, since I'm CCing emacs-devel:

For bytecode objects, equal-equality does not imply sxhash-equality.
That led to an assertion failure in the pdumper code, even though the
pdumper code itself is apparently correct; it simply does not allow
for paradoxical behavior of hash tables with bytecode keys. (The
muffled sound you hear in the background is my trying not to point out
that eq-vs-eql leads to similar paradoxes).

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 5:01 PM Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> wrote:
> >> Again, I doubt this is related to the original bug. That `equal'
> >> behaves weirdly like this is a problem I've mentioned before (when
> >> (equal a b) signals but (equal b a) succeeds), but the consensus then
> >> was not to change it, so it's possible this is only the rehashing
> >> check needing to be more careful.
> This consensus is wrong. We need to make equality imply sxhash equality or
> very odd things (like this) will happen.

I agree absolutely, of course, and maybe there's a consensus for
fixing equal for bytecodes but leaving it unfixed for cases in which
(equal a b) signals but (equal b a) does not.

> C++ and Java both require this
> relationship between hash code equality and object equality, and we should
> too.

We do document it, we just don't obey our documented API.

> Can we just fix the bytecode sxhash bug?

Is it too late to fix this for Emacs 27? If the answer is no, would a
good fix be to make equal=eq for bytecode objects? That should come
close to the old behavior, and we can fix things properly (by fixing
sxhash to hash byte code objects) on master.